aviationlaw.eu Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the aviationlaw.eu

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host aviationlaw.eu. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Fast Hosts Ltd .

southampton.ac.uk 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

search main menu skip to primary content skip to secondary content home about contributors contact us disclaimer and copyright notice international law international treaties international law – cases icao doc series european law regulations directives decisions, opinions and resolutions european law – cases law by country countries a-f australia australia – legislation (acts) australia – legislation (regulations) australia – bilateral agreements australia – cases australia – official documents australia – secondary materials austria austria – legislation austria – useful information plurinational state of bolivia plurinational state of bolivia – legislation cambodia cambodia – legislation cambodia – regulations canada canada – legislation cyprus cyprus – legislation cyprus – cases denmark denmark – legislation denmark – cases denmark – secondary materials france countries g-l germany germany – legislation germany – cases greece greece – legislation greece – secondary materials hong kong hong kong – cases hungary ireland ireland – cases italy italy – legislation italy – cases republic of kosovo republic of kosovo – legislation countries m-s republic of macedonia republic of macedonia – legislation malta malta – legislation malta – cases the netherlands the netherlands – legislation the netherlands – cases new zealand new zealand – bilateral agreements new zealand – statutes new zealand – statutory instruments new zealand – cases new zealand – investigation reports norway norway – legislation norway – cases poland poland – legislation poland – cases poland – secondary materials russia spain spain – legislation spain – cases spain – secondary materials spain – legal news sweden sweden – legislation sweden – cases sweden – secondary materials countries t-z thailand turkey turkey – statutes turkey – regulations turkey – cases turkey – secondary materials united kingdom united kingdom – statutes united kingdom – statutory instruments united kingdom – cases united states of america usa – federal legislation secondary materials official publications eu publications icao publications uk dft consultations other publications books journals articles conference papers aviation law blog essay competitions useful links events post navigation ← older posts asia pacific aviation liability event – february 2016 posted on march 3, 2016 by wp_admin comment by joseph wheeler, ialpg: asia pacific aviation liability joseph has kindly allowed his review of the recent asia pacific aviation liability event in february 2016 to be reproduced here. this inaugural event, jointly organised by ialpg and aeropodium and hosted by maurice blackburn lawyers in sydney, provided a forum for the exchange of ideas, analysis of novel issues going forward, and for all attendees to get an appreciation of how and why aviation liability in respect of particularly recreational remotely piloted aircraft, is something that requires both policymaker, and community attention in australia and further afield through asia pacific. the myriad issues which emerge given the easy misuse and dangerous applications of remotely piloted aircraft are readily moderated by the fact that australian safety regulators, and now more recently, many other states, are recognising the real level of risk carried by quickly developing technology. unlike model and radio controlled aircraft, which are notoriously difficult to learn how to fly, and have a well-established, historically responsible, and organised community of participants, remotely piloted recreational and aircraft come straight out of the box with exceptionally good stability controls, a variety of privacy-challenging features, and are thus affordable and accessible to those with diminished responsibility, children, and those who would purposefully (and successfully) use them for malicious or criminal purposes. the seminar heard about recent statistics which put laser attacks on pilots as the number two cause for pilot incapacitation events in australia in respect of high-capacity air transport operations. it is only with comprehensive federal, state and local level policy consideration that these fun but potentially dangerous aircraft will not join that list. presentations by michael nas, and aidan bruford, presented some surprising, but perhaps sobering realities in respect of drone misuse, and their frailties. for example mr nas presented statistics recently taken from the united states, that suggested the majority of incidents which could cause injury with drones happened above 400 feet above ground level. four hundred feet is the regulated ceiling of unmanned aerial vehicles under australia’s current regulations. it is the same case in the united states. furthermore, mr bruford from the department of infrastructure and regional development showed a youtube video wherein a teenage boy demonstrated how he could use his ipad to assume third-party control of an operational drone, and disable it. the liability consequences of these matters are frightening, and laws which purport to restrict flight to certain altitudes, away from crowds, or even prevent flight in public spaces can only prevent misuse in a fraction of potential instances. what is needed is more pervasive control and education, together with a different attitude towards remotely piloted aircraft from a variety of perspectives. for example, laser pointers are restricted imports in australia, depending on their power. this recognition of their ability to be used as weapons, and the fact that much of the more “dangerous” hardware is available off the shelf as an import from other nations, goes some way to mitigating the risks of non–hobbyists taking to the skies with aircraft more powerful than their capability or responsibility level. additionally, the airworthiness standards issue in relation to these aircraft is a difficult, though not insurmountable challenge. in the defence realm, wing commander andrew bannister discussed how a risk framework was developed in order to inform various aspects of airworthiness. it is this outcome-oriented approach which may well be a key, if not the key, to ensuring the enormous diversity of remotely piloted aircraft are able to conform to a suitably reliable standard of airworthiness. the problems of evidence in respect of drones that crash, causing injury or death, and the question of identifying the operator for the purposes of australian compensation legislation for damage by aircraft are also difficult but not impossible to resolve. the faa registration system, although arguably only regulating the already-compliant, demonstrates how operators themselves can and should be monitored by the overarching national airspace regulator, at least for the purpose of disseminating information/education material, and advice or counselling. in fact, as casa has a legislated mandate to foster education about the safe use of aviation, not just within the aviation industry, but within the community as a whole, it is uncertain why a registration system is not more broadly lauded locally as a good step forward. certainly, as raised in the context of the seminar this week, the australian government’s red tape reduction policy applies to even this area, such that more prescriptive regulation will only be considered if absolutely necessary. that is admirable, and forces australians and the world to look outside black letter law to other ways of modifying and controlling behaviours which present a danger in the air and on the ground. the seminar was a small step forward to making the conversation in respect of controlling the negative consequences of recreational remotely piloted aircraft use better appreciated for why it is important. this is certainly not, given our “corporate knowledge” of the adverse consequences of aviation such as fatal accidents, a discussion we should be having in the aftermath of a preventable disaster. our day to day focus, and certainly the focus of

URL analysis for aviationlaw.eu

http://www.aviationlaw.eu/law-by-country/countries-g-l/greece/greece-legislation/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/law-by-country/countries-t-z/united-states-of-america/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/law-by-country/countries-g-l/italy/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/secondary-materials/official-publications/eu-publications/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/law-by-country/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/contrib/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/law-by-country/countries-g-l/italy/italy-legislation/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/category/air-transport/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/law-by-country/countries-a-f/cambodia/cambodia-regulations/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/page/2/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/category/airlines/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/secondary-materials/useful-links/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/law-by-country/countries-g-l/ireland/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/secondary-materials/conference-papers/
http://www.aviationlaw.eu/law-by-country/countries-a-f/denmark/legislation/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

% The WHOIS service offered by EURid and the access to the records
% in the EURid WHOIS database are provided for information purposes
% only. It allows persons to check whether a specific domain name
% is still available or not and to obtain information related to
% the registration records of existing domain names.
%
% EURid cannot, under any circumstances, be held liable in case the
% stored information would prove to be wrong, incomplete or not
% accurate in any sense.
%
% By submitting a query you agree not to use the information made
% available to:
%
% - allow, enable or otherwise support the transmission of unsolicited,
% commercial advertising or other solicitations whether via email or
% otherwise;
% - target advertising in any possible way;
%
% - to cause nuisance in any possible way to the registrants by sending
% (whether by automated, electronic processes capable of enabling
% high volumes or other possible means) messages to them.
%
% Without prejudice to the above, it is explicitly forbidden to extract,
% copy and/or use or re-utilise in any form and by any means
% (electronically or not) the whole or a quantitatively or qualitatively
% substantial part of the contents of the WHOIS database without prior
% and explicit permission by EURid, nor in any attempt hereof, to apply
% automated, electronic processes to EURid (or its systems).
%
% You agree that any reproduction and/or transmission of data for
% commercial purposes will always be considered as the extraction of a
% substantial part of the content of the WHOIS database.
%
% By submitting the query you agree to abide by this policy and accept
% that EURid can take measures to limit the use of its WHOIS services
% in order to protect the privacy of its registrants or the integrity
% of the database.
%
% The EURid WHOIS service on port 43 (textual whois) never
% discloses any information concerning the registrant.
% Registrant and onsite contact information can be obtained through use of the
% webbased whois service available from the EURid website www.eurid.eu
%
% WHOIS aviationlaw.eu
Domain: aviationlaw.eu

Registrant:
NOT DISCLOSED!
Visit www.eurid.eu for webbased whois.

Onsite(s):
NOT DISCLOSED!
Visit www.eurid.eu for webbased whois.

Registrar:
Name: Tucows.com Co.
Website: domainhelp.tucows.com/

Name servers:
ns3.livedns.co.uk
ns2.livedns.co.uk
ns1.livedns.co.uk

Please visit www.eurid.eu for more info.

  REFERRER http://www.eurid.eu

  REGISTRAR EURID

SERVERS

  SERVER eu.whois-servers.net

  ARGS aviationlaw.eu

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME aviationlaw.eu

REGISTRAR

  NAME Tucows.com Co.

  URL domainhelp.tucows.com/

NSERVER

  NS3.LIVEDNS.CO.UK 213.171.192.254

  NS2.LIVEDNS.CO.UK 213.171.193.250

  NS1.LIVEDNS.CO.UK 213.171.192.250

OWNER
NOT DISCLOSED!
Visit www.eurid.eu for webbased whois.
Onsite(s):
NOT DISCLOSED!
Visit www.eurid.eu for webbased whois.

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .